Artificial intelligence based health coaching based on ketone levels of participants

ABSTRACT

A system is disclosed that uses profiles of users, including monitored ketone levels of the users, to assess effectiveness levels of health programs (such as weight loss programs) assigned to the users, and to select health program modifications for the users. The system may use a machine learning (artificial intelligence) algorithm to adaptively learn how to classify users and to select messaging and behavioral modifications for the users. For example, in some embodiments the system classifies the users and provides associated health program recommendations using a computer model trained with expert-classified user data records. As another example, a set of rules may be used to generate the health program recommendations and related messaging, and the set of rules may automatically be modified over time based on feedback data reflective of health program effectiveness levels produced by such rules. In some embodiments the system includes a mobile application that runs on mobile devices of users and communicates wirelessly with breath analysis devices of the users. The mobile application may also communicate with a server-based system that generates the health program recommendations.

PRIORITY CLAIM

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Appl. No. 62/408,208, filed Oct. 14, 2016, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to machine-based processes, including machine learning processes, for automatically coaching participants in a weight loss or other health related program based on monitored ketone levels of the participants.

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a major individual and public health concern in the United States and throughout the world. In the United States alone, approximately 33% of the adult population is obese and another 33% are overweight. Treatment of obesity and other weight-related disorders involves a multi-factorial approach (typically a combination of diet, exercise, behavioral health modifications and sometimes medication or surgery) and commonly requires significant and sometimes permanent lifestyle modification. Especially in adults, the oft-required lifestyle changes can make obesity an extremely difficult condition to overcome.

The main goal of obesity management is reducing the amount of fat in the body. For various reasons (to motivate subjects, to enforce compliance and to troubleshoot/customize diets), it is useful and important to have a means to track and trend fat metabolism.

As an example, individuals suffering from other metabolic conditions, such as elevated cholesterol or high blood pressure, may benefit from improving their diet or changing exercise patterns. A growing number of individuals seek to reduce their carbohydrate intake to increase utilization of fat as an energy source, in hopes of reducing their overall insulin usage and thereby counteracting metabolic abnormalities (such as high blood pressure).

Athletes and fitness-conscious individuals are concerned about staying in peak physical condition, and are often actively engaged in structured sports activities (whether professional or not). Such individuals struggle with making data-driven decisions about how best to optimize their biochemical and physical condition. They often try to make “smart” decisions about how best to reach their fitness or health goals.

However, tracking and trending fat metabolism is useful beyond weight management and the treatment of obesity. Anorexia nervosa is a psychiatric disorder having substantial implications and is oftentimes a lifelong illness. The disorder is most prevalent in adolescents and young adults, and is 90% more common in young women than men. Because of the complex nature of the disorder and the significant level of mental health treatment, treatment of anorexia nervosa is most effective in-center and is correspondingly expensive. Improving patient outcomes requires considerable counseling and monitoring.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

A system is disclosed that uses profiles of users, including monitored ketone levels of the users, to assess effectiveness levels of health programs (such as weight loss programs) assigned to the users, and to select health program modifications for the users. The system may use a machine learning (artificial intelligence) algorithm to adaptively learn how to classify users and to select messaging and behavioral modifications for the users. For example, in some embodiments the system classifies the users and provides associated health program recommendations using a computer model trained with expert-classified user data records. As another example, a set of rules may be used to generate the health program recommendations and related messaging, and the set of rules may automatically be modified over time based on feedback data reflective of health program effectiveness levels produced by such rules. In some embodiments the system includes a mobile application that runs on mobile devices of users and communicates wirelessly with breath analysis devices of the users. The mobile application may also communicate with a server-based system that generates the health program recommendations.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates an AI-based health coaching system according to one embodiment.

FIGS. 2A-2D illustrate examples of how ketone levels (scores) of users can be used to select health programs for the user.

FIG. 3 illustrates the relationship between carbohydrate intake and ketone levels for a user population.

FIGS. 4A-4C illustrate the profiles, including ketone levels, of three individuals.

FIG. 5 illustrates a computer architecture that may be used to implement the system of FIG. 1.

FIG. 6 illustrates a collaborative filtering algorithm that may be used to generate health program recommendations.

FIGS. 7-10 illustrate example screen displays of one embodiment of the mobile application.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

Ketones are useful to track and trend progress on a fat loss program and other health related programs. Ketone concentrations in the body and in body fluids (e.g., blood, urine, breath, or some combination of these) are correlated with fat metabolism. In the body, three main “ketone bodies” are generated: acetoacetic acid, β-hydroxybutyric acid, and acetone. In the case of acetone, because it is volatile, it is released into alveolar air when the blood brings it in contact with the lungs.

Generally, ketone levels increase in relation to increases in the body's fat metabolism. Higher ketone concentrations indicate greater metabolism of fat. During a net caloric deficit, greater fat metabolism portends increased loss of stored fat (e.g., a primary objective in weight reduction). Measurement of ketones offers the potential to be a powerful and accurate measure of fat metabolism, and therefore provides many advantages in the management of metabolic conditions and obesity management.

The term “ketone bodies” or “ketones” includes those that are present in the body including, without limitation, acetone, acetoacetic acid (also known as acetoacetate), and 3-hydroxybutyric acid (also known as β-hydroxybutyrate or β-HBA). The devices and systems herein apply to measurement of ketones in breath, blood, urine, saliva, other body fluids, or via the skin.

Another instance in which measurement of breath acetone is useful is for the management and treatment of Type 1 diabetics. In Type 1 diabetics, where there is insufficient intracellular sugar or where sugar metabolism is impaired, the body resorts to metabolizing fat. This increase in fat metabolism can result in substantial and unwanted increases in ketone production. Because ketones are acidic, their build-up in the blood stream can cause a downward shift in blood pH, assuming that the body's ability to buffer pH is compromised or overwhelmed. This can result in a condition called diabetic ketoacidosis. In addressing this phenomenon, the objective is to monitor ketone levels to detect its onset and to aid in its management.

Portable breath analysis devices have recently become available that enable users to monitor their ketone levels. Examples of such devices are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,341,632 and U.S. Patent Appl. Nos. 62/338,312, filed May 18, 2016, Ser. No. 15/077,642, filed Mar. 22, 2016, 62/396,240, filed on Sep. 19, 2016, and 62/368,311, filed Jul. 29, 2016, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. In some cases, the portable breath analysis device uses a wireless (e.g., Bluetooth, WIFI, Zigbee) transceiver and connection to report the measurements to a mobile application that runs on the user's smartphone, tablet, or other mobile or personal device. The mobile application may in turn report the measurements to a remote system. In some cases, the breath analysis device may alternatively report the measurements to the remote system directly, in which case the mobile application may be omitted.

Given the availability of portable analysis devices (including breath analysis devices) with wireless capabilities, it is desirable to have a system that can provide automated, personalized feedback or coaching, such as weight loss coaching, to individual users based on their monitored ketone levels and other factors. FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of such a system. This system operates generally by monitoring ketone levels and other attributes of participants in health-related programs, and by making personalized, machine-generated changes or updates to such programs to improve program effectiveness. The programs may include or consist of diet and/or exercise programs intended to achieve weight loss or other health benefits. For purposes of illustration, the system will be described primarily in the context of weight loss programs, and the program participants will be referred to primarily as “users” of the system. The terms “recommendations,” “program recommendations” and “coaching” will be used to refer generally to the auto-selected programs, program updates, behavioral modifications, and associated messaging, provided by the system to or for users.

As illustrated in FIG. 1, each user of the system uses a portable breath analysis device 30 generate ketone measurements from breath samples as described above and in the aforementioned patent references. Each such device 30 includes a ketone sensor capable of generating ketone measurements from breath samples of a corresponding user, and includes a wireless transceiver that is used to report the ketone measurements. The measured ketones may include, for example, acetone, acetoacetate, and/or B-hydroxybutyric acid. In some embodiments the ketone measurements may instead be generated from other types of bodily fluid samples of the users, such as blood or urine samples.

As the ketone measurements are generated, they are communicated over a communications network, which may include the Internet, to a remote, Artificial Intelligence (AI) based health coaching system 40. In the illustrated embodiment, each breath analysis device 30 communicates wirelessly with a mobile application (“mobile app”) installed on a smartphone, tablet, or other mobile communications device (“mobile device”) 34 of the respective user. The mobile application 34 may implement a variety of features (such as the features described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,341,632, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein) for assisting users in generating, monitoring and tagging ketone measurements, and for processing such measurements. In some embodiments, the breath analysis devices 30 may alternatively communicate directly with the health coaching system 40, such as via a WIFI connection; in these embodiments, the mobile application 32 and mobile device 34, may be omitted.

In some embodiments, the mobile application 32 may periodically ask the user various questions (e.g., “are you hungry?”) to assess the effectiveness of the current program, and may record the user's answers. Further, the mobile application 32 may include a “daily journal” or “weekly questionnaire” feature through which the users can record various types of information and events. For example, users may specify that they are low on energy, hungry, constipated, or unhappy, or that they have deviated from their diet. In one embodiment the mobile application prompts the user to assign a numerical rating to each of the following: (1) energy level, (2) focus, (3) hunger, (4) good sleep, (5) pain, (6) constipation, (7) cravings, and (8) boredom.

The mobile application 32 may report these and other types of user information to the system 40 for use in providing personalized, machine-automated coaching. Further, in some embodiments the coaching may be supplemented or filtered by a human coach, in which case updates from the human coach may be recorded by the system and, in some cases, used by machine learning algorithms to improve the system.

In some embodiments, the system 40 may also be able to acquire other types of data about the users. For example, some users may use wireless glucose monitors that report glucose measurements to the health coaching system 40 via the mobile application 32 or via another channel. As another example, in the context of a weight loss program, the users/participants may use wireless scales that report their weight measurements to the system 40 via the mobile application 32 or otherwise. In one embodiment, the wireless scale, upon taking a weight measurement, wirelessly transmits the weight measurement to the mobile application 32 without displaying the measurement, such that it is withheld from the user; the wireless scale in this embodiment may lack a display.

As another example in the context of weight loss programs, the mobile application 32, or a separate mobile application (such as MyFitnessPal or Lose It), may enable each user to track, and report to the system 40, their food intake and exercise activities. Other possible data sources include blood test results, heart rate data, location data (reflecting of visits to restaurants or gyms), credit card transaction logs (reflective of restaurant visits), sleep logs, the user's home address (reflective of what types of exercise the user may comfortably take part in because of weather patterns), and web search logs (reflective of user being hungry). Further, personal profiles (which may be stored as, for example, database records or text files) may be created by the system by the users themselves and/or their coaches, and may be considered by the system in providing coaching. These personal profiles may, for example, include demographic data (age, gender, ethnicity, etc.), weight loss (or other health-related) goals, genetic testing results, medical history data, and various other types of information.

As described below, the health coaching system 40 may use the above and other types of user/participant data to generate personalized recommendations and programs for the participants. In some cases, the coaching may be interactive in the sense that the system enables the user (or a health or weight loss coach of the user) to select from multiple options for attaining a desired goal. For example, a user may opt to want to lose weight as quickly as possible instead of a less aggressive strategy. Additionally, a user may indicate to the system 40 certain personal preferences, idiosyncrasies, and desired activities that the system 40 may take into account. For example, the user may indicate that they regularly go to the gym and lift heavy weights, that they bike to work, or that they really like or dislike certain types of foods. The recommendations may also be based on the current location of the user (as detected by the mobile device using a GPS receiver or other location-detection technology), and the proximity of that location to restaurants, gyms, the user's house, etc.

For purposes of illustration, the system 40 will be described primarily in the context of a weight loss program. As will be recognized, however, the underlying processes are also applicable to automated health coaching involving other types of conditions (such as diabetes and anorexia). For example, the system may support the ability for the user to select from the following types of goals: (1) lose weight, (2) gain weight, (3) enhance athletic performance, (4) treat or reduce the severity of some other medical condition, (5) learn more about how the participant's body reacts to various foods.

As further shown in FIG. 1, the health coaching system 40, in one embodiment, includes a trained model 42 that classifies users based on their ketone measurements and/or other user data. The trained model 42 classifies the users based on their data records 44 and a database of user class definitions 46. Each user data record may include, for example, a timestamped history of the user's ketone measurements (and any other measurements such as weight, glucose level, heart rate, etc.); demographic data such as age, gender, and height, and other user-supplied data such as medications taken; a timestamped history of the classifications and weight loss (or other health) programs assigned to the user, including program updates and recommendations generated by the system; weight loss goals; lifestyle habits; personal preferences; food intake events; exercise events; diet non-compliance events; user feedback on program satisfaction; nutritional sophistication level; etc. For some types of data, the users may provide the data to the system 40 by entering it into the mobile application 32, a web-based portal, or other data collection interface. Although the use of a trained model 42 is preferred, in some embodiments the system 40 may classify users, or otherwise make program recommendations, without the use of a trained model. For example, as described below with reference to FIG. 6, the system 40 may generate program recommendations using a collaborative filtering algorithm that seeks to recommend to a target user programs that have been effective for similar users.

A given user may be assigned to multiple classes concurrently, and the task of classifying a given user may, in some embodiments, be repeated whenever a new ketone measurement (or other significant data point) becomes available. Because a user's classification may change over time, the trained model 42 may assign classes as a function of other external parameters that exist outside of the user's data record. For example, the model 42 may be a function of the user's data record and a “target date” and the classes, 46, returned by the model, 42, may be interpreted as the classification of that user at the particular date. In one embodiment, some classifications assigned by the classifier 48 are of the user (or user data record) generally, and other classifications are of the effectiveness of a given program assigned to the user. An example of the later type of classification is an “effective” classification, which indicates that the health program assigned to the user is producing desired results.

In some embodiments, the classifier 48 may use a set of rules to classify users and to select actions to be performed. Some rules may, for example, be triggered by the receipt of a submission from a user's mobile device 32 of a ketone score, or other data point, that can potentially effect the user's current classification. An example of such a rule is one that determines whether the user's recent ketone scores justify a new categorization. Other rules may, for example be triggered by the reclassification of a user. For example, when a user is reclassified (such as from “effective” to “non-compliant”), a rule may be invoked that selects a new diet/exercise program for the user or that notifies a coach for the user. Other rules may, for example, be invoked periodically (e.g., once per week) based on the passage of time. A preferred embodiment of a rule-based implementation of the system is discussed below with reference to FIG. 5.

The class definitions 46 are selected or generated such that the class or classes to which a user is currently assigned map to particular recommendations (e.g. “reduce daily carb intake by X”) and/or coaching protocols. These recommendations may be provided to the user by the mobile application 32, by a web portal, via text messages, and/or by any other communication method. The class-based recommendations may be generated by the health coaching system 40, the mobile application 32, or a combination thereof. Some classes may be defined manually by physicians and other experts, while others may be generated or inferred automatically using machine learning methods. Examples of classes (labeled in terms of their recommendations or coaching protocols) are:

-   -   No Change     -   Further decrease carbs     -   Increase fat     -   See a physician for a blood workup and medication assessment     -   Decrease protein     -   Remove artificial sweeteners     -   Initiate a fat fast.

As one example of how machine learning may be used, a group of experts may initially classify a number of user records into a set of classifications that correspond to respective coaching protocols or recommendations. For example, a human expert may review the record (including ketone measurements, weight loss goals, demographic data, etc.) of a weight loss program participant and make a recommendation (representing an assigned class) regarding an action to take or protocol to follow. These expert-classified records may then be used to train the model 42 using an appropriate algorithm, such as a Neural Network, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Probabilistic Graphical Model (including Bayesian networks or Markov models), or Decision Tree model. Through a training process, various user attributes or “features” are computed from the user's data records and then the algorithm learns how much weight to give to each feature by analyzing the classifications given by human experts to existing user records. These learned weights become an integral component of a trained model 42, and are used to reproduce the behavior of human experts on unseen user records. Examples of features that can be used are listed in Table 1. As described below, the system 40 may also adaptively adjust the weights over time based on the results, including weight loss results, produced by the system's classifications and associated recommendations.

TABLE 1 Example features User-specified weight loss goal BMI (computed from height and weight) Age (computed from date of birth) Sex Average carbs for past 3 days (taken from diet log) Average protein for past 3 days Average fat for past 3 days Average calories for past 3 days Ketone (breath, blood or urine) reading at day t - 0 Ketone (breath, blood or urine) reading at day t - 1 Ketone (breath, blood or urine) reading at day t - 2 Average heart rate for past 3 days Medications Ketone levels over first seven days after reducing daily carb intake to 20 grams Evidence of insulin resistance from blood results or user's medications Number of times user reported being hungry in last 7 days Nutritional sophistication level

The foregoing features are merely examples. In some embodiments the number of features may, for example, be in the hundreds. The system 40 may use a data repository of feature definitions to calculate or otherwise determine features for a user based on the user's data record.

As shown in FIG. 1, the trained model 42 includes a feature extractor 46 that computes, extracts, or generates the features based on a user record and other parameters, for example a “target date.” These features are then passed to a record classifier 48 that assigns the user record to one or more of the defined classes. The record classifier 48 may include sub-classifiers as is known in the art. The set of one or more classes is then used to select corresponding messaging, and/or a coaching protocol, to be used for automatically coaching the respective user. Although a user's data record may be large, not all of the data in the record is necessarily considered during classification. For example, through feature extraction, the system may effectively disregard measurements taken, e.g., more than two weeks ago.

In some cases multiple distinct trained models may be used, such that the classification task is multilayered and nested. For example, some features may be used by one model to initially classify a user, and the results may be exposed as a feature to a “top-level” recommendations model. As another example, the system 40 may include different classifiers for different types of recommendations—for example, the system could include an “increase carbs” classifier and an “increase exercise” classifier, both of which operate as “yes or no” classifiers. As another example, the system could train and use separate models for males versus females, or for other demographic categories.

In some embodiments, the system 40 may include a supervised feedback loop in which computer-generated classifications are shown to human experts. The human experts can then indicate whether or not the trained model did the right thing. This data can be used by an iterative “training process” to continually improve the quality of the trained model in an on-line system. The system 40 could, for example, randomly ask an expert whether a prediction was correct.

The system could also assess the accuracy of its predictions without involving experts. For example, once the system classifies a user and provides a corresponding program recommendation, the system could track the user's progress over time, and could infer that the prediction/classification was inaccurate if the user fails to make progress (e.g., fails to lose weight).

In some embodiments, the system 40 may also use a machine learning process to automatically modify the class definitions, including the associated coaching recommendations, based on feedback. The feedback may include weight loss measurements reflective of the effectiveness levels of specific classifications and coaching protocols. Through this process, the system may learn, for example, that users whose ketone levels increase relatively slowly in response to carb reduction should be placed on a relatively strict carb reduction program for an extended time period.

In some embodiments the system 40 may assign a single class to a user record and associated parameters. In other embodiments, the system 40 may assign multiple classes. Some of these classes may map directly to recommendations while others may map to suggested options. For example, the system may classify a user and provide the recommendation that “no change is needed” while also providing the suggestion that they may “feel free to incorporate fruit in the diet.”

Some of the defined classes may be persistent classes that are assigned permanently or for relatively long time periods. One example is the user/participant's nutritional sophistication level, which may be determined by having the user take an online survey. For relatively sophisticated users, the system may generate recommendations/messaging that includes more scientific terminology that for other users. For users with relatively low levels of nutritional sophistication, the system's output may include more pictures and less scientific terminology.

Another example of a persistent class is one that represents the rate at which a user's ketone score (representing a ketone level) increases to a desired level in response to a transition to a low-carb diet. This classification may be assigned by instructing the participant (e.g., via the mobile application 32) to reduce daily carb intake to, e.g., less than 20 grams, and to take daily ketone measurements during a particular time window each day. Based on the daily ketone measurements for a particular duration of time, the model 42 may then classify the user into one of N (e.g., 3, 4 or 5) classes, each corresponding to a different rate of increase. One such class may, for example, represent those users whose ketone score exceeds a desired threshold in less than seven days; for these users, the system 40 may select a protocol that gives the user a relatively high degree of flexibility in selecting dieting options. At the other end of the spectrum, a class may represent those users who are unable to reach the desired ketone score within 10 days; for these users, the system 40 may select a relatively strict protocol that, for example, requires the user to maintain daily carb intake at less than 20 grams (among other possible actions) until the desired weight loss is achieved. In some embodiments, the system 40 may use a fixed set of classes to classify the users, selected by human experts and the operators of the system 40. In other embodiments, the system 40 may learn the set of classes dynamically using machine learning (artificial intelligence) methods, for example K-Means clustering to identify groups of similar users that should be following similar protocols.

FIGS. 2A-2D illustrate an example of a set of four classes that may be used in this process. These figures all exemplify a two-variable system involving a pre-determined ketone threshold (“Ketone Threshold”) and a time period (“System Time”). The Ketone Threshold is set based on the type of diet, the user's goals and, preferably but optionally, the values of others. In the following examples, the Threshold is set based on a low carbohydrate diet, where a level of 4 ppm (in the case of breath acetone) is above the population “baseline” breath acetone level and generally indicates a dieting/fat burning state. (The ketone score used in the examples represents parts per million of breath acetone.) The System Time is set based on the expected time that a user will reach the Ketone Threshold. In this example, the time is based on the amount of time that it takes an individual who understands carbohydrate restriction to see elevated ketones, not accounting for setbacks or metabolic challenges. Other values may be used.

The first, shown in FIG. 2A, represents users whose ketone score reaches 4 within the first seven days and stays well above that threshold. For these users, the system may provide coaching to the user on adding and subtracting exercise activities and modifying the user's diet. The diet modifications will typically allow the user to increase daily carb intake beyond 20 grams.

For example, the mobile application 32 may recommend foods that have a low glycemic index or are available at a restaurant that the user is visiting (e.g., “Your Ketone Score has been high over the past 5 days—nice job restricting your carbs. I see that you are going to Kona Grill, consider sharing a creme brûlée, which has fewer carbs and no starches. Stay away from the butter cake.”). As another example, the mobile application may provide the following location-based messaging: “I see that you are at a sushi place. If you would like to have sushi tonight, have 3 pieces only. Then be sure to wear your heart rate monitor before leaving home tomorrow [remind user before the user leaves home]. Be sure to burn an extra 100 calories during your workout to compensate for the sushi that you ate [remind user during the workout].”

The second class, represented by the graph in FIG. 2B, represents users whose ketone score increases well above the threshold shortly after the seven-day threshold. For these users, the system may again give the user the option to exceed 20 grams of carbohydrates and to modify exercise; however, the system may regulate the timing of such changes so that the changes occur at controlled time increments.

FIG. 2C illustrates a class in which the ketone score (KS) reaches the threshold of 4 after 7 days and thereafter remains slightly above that level. For these users, the system may instruct the user to keep daily carb intake below 20 grams until the ketone score (KS) reaches 7; the system thereafter enable the user to experiment with diet and/or exercise changes as long as the ketone score remains above 2.

FIG. 2D represents a class in which the ketone score does not reach the threshold of 4 during the relevant time period. For these users, the system recommends that the user maintain daily carb intake below 20 grams, and may enter into a “troubleshooting” mode that seeks to learn the reason(s) why the ketone score is staying low. The troubleshooting protocol may, for example, instruct the user to reduce calorie intake, to take ketone measurements more frequently, to generate glucose measurements, and/or to take other actions useful for determining the reasons for the low ketone level increase. Examples of such actions include: further decreasing carbs, increasing fat intake, seeing a physician for a blood workup and medication assessment, decreasing protein, removing artificial sweeteners, and initiating a fat fast.

The graph shown in FIG. 3 illustrates why classes similar to those of FIGS. 2A-2D are useful. As this graph illustrates, most people will exhibit ketone levels above the population baseline (e.g., above 3 ppm in the case of breath acetone) if they reduce daily carb intake below 20 grams. As the graph shows, a significant portion of the population will also experience significant ketone level increases at higher levels of daily carb intake. Thus, it is desirable to identify, for specific users, the maximum carb intake level that will allow the user to reach a desired ketone level or range. For some users this level may be 20 grams, while for others it may be 30, 40 or higher. For these users with higher maximums, the system may enable the user to achieve their desired weight loss goals without severely restricting carb intake.

Ketosis is not a binary state. Even non-dieting, healthy individuals have ketones in their bloodstream, but at a low level. Thus, ketone levels are present in a spectrum. Although ketone levels are higher when an individual is on a low carbohydrate diet where the body is primarily using fat, an individual could generate ketones on a traditional “low calorie” diet where the body is using a mixed fuel tank (glucose and fat). Thus, a ketone monitor could be used to dial in to an individual's target level of carbohydrate restriction, but, for some individuals, could also help dial-in on a necessary level of calorie restriction. For example, Kundu et. al. presented diets in which a patient group was consuming up to 147 g of carbohydrates, but on a 1200-calorie diet, and still generated ketones. In most circles, 147 g of carbohydrate consumption is not considered “low carb” but, for at least some individuals, such as those represented by the right-most portion of the graph above, they would expect to see some level of ketosis.

In one embodiment, when a user first begins using the system 40, the new user is instructed (e.g., by the mobile application 32) to start a low carb diet (e.g., below 20 grams of carbs per day), and the system initiates a “calibration” phase for the user to determine the rate at which the user's ketone levels change. This phase typically lasts for 10 to 14 days, during which the user in instructed to generate daily ketone measurements. At the end of the calibration phase, the classifier 48 uses the ketone scores to assign to the user a persistent classification (such as one of the four classifications shown in FIGS. 2A-2D) representing user's ketone level response to the low carb diet.

Following the calibration phase, the system 40 may periodically (e.g., on a daily basis, or when new measurement data is available) classify the user in terms of whether the user is burning or gaining fat. For example, as shown in the mobile application screen display of FIG. 7 (discussed below), the classifier 48 may assign to the user one of the following three classifications: Fat Storage, Neutral, or Fat Burn. The classifier may determine which of these three classifications applies based, for example, on (1) the user's ketone scores and weight measurements, (2) the user's ketone scores and resting heart rate, or (3) the user's ketone scores, weight measurements, and resting hear rate. Examples of algorithms (which may be implemented as rules) that may be used for this purpose are described below under the heading “Fat gain/loss classification.”

In one embodiment, the task of classifying the user as being in a fat storage phase, neutral phase, or fat burn phase is performed once the user completes three daily tasks: (1) generating a ketone measurement with the breath analysis device 30, which reports the measurement to the mobile application 32 as described above, (2) generating a weight measurement (optionally with a wireless scale that reports the weight measurement to the mobile application 32 as described above), and (3) answering a set of questions that are presented by the mobile application 32. To remind the user to perform the first two tasks, both the scale and breath analysis device may light up in the morning (or at another appropriate time during the day) until they are used to take their respective measurements; the mobile application 32 may control the timing with which these devices light up. The mobile application 32 may also proactively present the user with the questions, or with a reminder to use the mobile application to answer the questions.

The profiles of three actual users will now be described with reference to FIGS. 4A-4C to further illustrate the factors that may be considered by the system 40 in coaching users. FIG. 4A illustrates a user having a weight loss goal of achieving “weight loss without compromising workout.” The user's ketone measurements over a 24-day period are shown at the bottom of the figure. In this example, the ketone score exceeded four at day 3 after starting the low-carb (20 grams of carbs or less per day) diet, and remained well above that threshold thereafter. Based on this data and the classifications of FIGS. 2A-2D, the system would use the classification of FIG. 2A, allowing the user to vary his or her diet.

In this particular example, after day 20 the user was allowed an additional ½ cup of rice countered with increased exercise. This resulted in a small drop in the ketone score. In some cases the system 40 may respond to such a drop by recommending that the user take a particular action, such as initiating glucose monitoring to provide an additional indicator.

FIG. 4B shows the profile of a user having the goal of “weight loss that is sustainable.” This user's ketone score did not exceed four until day 9, but exceeded this threshold by a significant margin thereafter. The class shown above in FIG. 2B corresponds to this user. After day 20 the user was permitted to add vegetables and fruit to the diet, resulting in a drop in the ketone score.

FIG. 4C shows the profile of a user having the goal of “rapid weight loss.” This user's ketone score did not reach four until day 15, and only reached a maximum level of six. As a result, the user was instructed to not to make any diet changes, and to keep daily carb intake at or below 20 grams. Because this particular user deviated from the ketone measurement time window four times over 21 days, the system may assume, in generating recommendations, that the user has also likely deviated from the dietary restrictions.

Table 2 below shows another method that may be used by the system 40 to classify users for coaching purposes. In this example, each user is classified into one of four categories based on the user's weight loss goal or history. If the user's goal is to lose 50+ pounds or has a history of being 50+ pounds overweight, the system recommends that the user maintain daily carb intake at 20 grams or less until the weight loss goal is reached. For lesser weight loss goals, the amount of time for maintaining carb intake at or below 20 grams is progressively less, and the system 40 may implement a protocol for finding the optimal carb intake level or range. If a user in the lower three categories chooses to keep max daily carb intake to 20 grams, the system may compute, and notify the user of, an estimated time for reaching their desired weight loss goal.

TABLE 2 Profile Method Approach 50+ lbs. * 20 g until weight Cannot toggle is lost 30 to 50 lbs. 20 g for 6 months Find optimal range, time not specified 15 to 30 lbs. 20 g for 3 months Find optimal range, time not specified <15 lbs. 20 g for 6 weeks Find optimal range, time not specified * or has a history of being 50 lbs. or more overweight

Other profile characteristics may include the user's medication history, prior “ketone” history, weight history, and general medical history. For example, if the user exhibits evidence of insulin resistance, this may be cause to profile the user into a separate category.

The example classifications illustrated in FIGS. 2A-2D and Table 2 are relatively simple classifications that look at only one user attribute or a small number of attributes. The system of FIG. 1 is capable of generating class definitions that rely on a much larger set of user attributes and features to classify users and user records. For example, once a set of users has been classified by a set of experts as “capable of significant weight loss at daily max carb intake of 40 grams and minimal exercise increase,” the training algorithm may identify a relatively large number of user attributes and associated features (e.g., 10 or more) useful for automatically identifying these users. Once these users are identified by the trained model 42, the system may coach these users according to a protocol that only requires them to reduce daily carb intake to 40 grams and that does not require significant exercise increases.

The system 40 may also use regression to identify or modify cut-off values used for classification. Examples of such cut-off values are the ketone score threshold of 4, and the time period of seven days, used in the categories of FIGS. 2A-2D.

Referring again to FIG. 1, the health coaching system 40, including its illustrated components 42, 44, 46, 48 (and the additional components shown in FIG. 5, discussed below), may be implemented by a computer system programmed with executable program modules stored on one or more computer-readable media (hard disk drives, solid state memory devices, etc.). The coaching system 40 may be distributed or replicated across multiple physical servers or other computing devices of the computer system, which may or may not be co-located. Each such server typically includes one or more hardware processors that execute program instructions, a solid state memory, a network interface, and various other hardware components. The computer system may, in some embodiments, be a cloud computing system in which tasks are allocated dynamically to machines. The functionality of the coaching system 40 may be distributed among software components differently than shown in FIG. 1, and some components and functions may be omitted in some embodiments. The data repositories 44, 46 shown in FIG. 1 may include databases, flat file systems, and/or other types of data storage systems, and may use hard disk drives, solid state memories, and/or other types of non-transitory computer storage devices.

Further, the disclosed logic for classifying users and generating recommendations may, in some embodiments, be implemented partly or wholly in the mobile application 32. As one example, the coaching system 40 may push to the mobile application 32 the class definitions and other data needed to classify users and output associated recommendations, and the mobile application 32 may then use this information to coach the user.

The mobile devices 34 may include smartphones, tablet computing devices, smart watches, computerized eyewear devices, and other types of portable wireless devices capable of running applications. The mobile application 32 may be implemented in executable program code that is stored in the non-transitory computer storage (e.g., solid state memories) of the mobile devices 34. All of the processes and process steps described above may be embodied in, and fully automated via, the program components described above. Some or all of the functions may instead be performed by specialized computer hardware, such as ASICs or FPGA devices.

FIG. 5 illustrates one embodiment of a system architecture that may be used to implement the AI-based health coaching system 40 of FIG. 1. In this embodiment, the mobile application 32 (one instance shown) communicates over a network with the system 40 via an API (Application Program Interface) 50, which may be exposed over HTTP. The API defines a series of endpoints that the mobile application 32 can call to invoke a procedure (such as initiating a classification update) or access or manipulate a remote resource. One notable resource that the mobile application 32 interacts with through the API is the set of user records 44. The user record for a given user typically contains the user's profile data (described above), ketone scores, and information about what health management (e.g., weight loss) program is currently assigned to the user. When the mobile application 32 gets new ketone scores from the breath analysis device 30, the mobile application reports the scores via the API, which stores them in the user records 44 in association with the user.

The system 40 may initiate reclassification of the user (and thus assessment of the current program's effectiveness) periodically or in response to a request/submission from the user's mobile application 32. With the periodic approach, a scheduler 54 periodically (e.g., once per day or once per week) places a classification task onto a transactional queue 56 for the user. The scheduler may always place a task on the queue or it may only do so if certain conditions are met (e.g., new ketone scores have been posted since the last time the user was classified).

With the request-based approach, the API 50 adds the classification task to the transactional queue 56 in response to receiving a request/submission from the mobile application 32. For example, the API may initiate recalculation of the program's effectiveness every 3 ketone readings it receives for the user; or, it may place a task on the transactional queue when an incoming request to the API indicates that the user has changed time zones (which indicates that the user may be traveling).

Worker machines 60 pull tasks from the queue 56 in a consistent and atomic manner such that, in a preferred embodiment, only one worker machine and process executes a task at a time and a task is executed a maximum of one time. The assigned worker machine executes the task and accesses data from the user's data record 44, and passes that information to the classifier/recommender 42. The classifier/recommender 42 analyzes the received data and optionally consults a rules database 46, which may contain class definitions and associated rules. Once the classifier/recommender 42 makes a classification, the assigned worker machine/process 60 can update the user's record and optionally send a notification to the user through a notification system 62. The notification system 62, if invoked, sends a message to the user's mobile application 32 to alert the user of new program information. This message preferably includes a value that informs the mobile application 32 that the program has changed and that it should re-fetch the user's program data from the API. The App may periodically “poll” the API at regular intervals to ensure that it gets up-to-date information on the program effectiveness even in the event that notification messages are lost or not reliably delivered. In some embodiments, the notification system 62 may instead proactively send the new program information to the user's mobile application 32.

As explained above, the messaging provided to the users may be tailored by the system to the nutritional sophistication levels of the users. Similarly, the system may tend to recommend more complex diets and/or exercise programs from relatively sophisticated users.

In some embodiments the results of the classification process may be a ranked list of health (e.g., weight loss) programs or program options. This ranked list may be presented directly to the user (e.g., via the mobile application, as described above), or may be presented to a health or weight loss coach of the user. In either case, if multiple options are presented, feedback from the user or coach may be solicited and recorded regarding which option is selected. In some cases a program recommendation/update generated by the system may be modified by the coach, in which case the coach may record the modification with the system. The program modifications entered by coaches may be used by system 40 to create new rules and/or modify existing rules.

In some implementations a human coach may be able to provide to the system 40 his or her input on a given recommendation after that recommendation has already been provided to the user/participant. For example, the system 40 may communicate a program update (e.g., “reduce daily carb intake by X”) to the user, and may later solicit or otherwise obtain feedback from the user's coach on whether the update was helpful. This mode may be used for relatively low risk program participants, and for relatively minor program updates (e.g., minor diet or exercise changes).

In some embodiments the classifier/recommender 42 may be a non-rule driven subsystem, in which case the rules database 46 may be omitted. For example, the classifier (or a non-classifier type recommendation engine) could additionally or alternatively employ algorithms that incorporate Support Vector Machine (SVM), Hidden Markov Model (HMM), Collaborative Filtering, and other types of algorithms. As one example, the system may include a collaborative filtering based recommendation engine that maps users to similar users based on their respective user data records. The recommendation engine may then use these mappings to recommend to a given user a program or program option that has produced successful results (such as good ketone scores or weight loss results) for one or more similar users.

As shown in FIG. 5, the system may also include an adaptive refinement process 70 that monitors the ketone scores (and possibly other measures of success such as user satisfaction ratings and weight measurements) produced by specific rules and classifications, and which adjusts the rules database 46 accordingly. For example, the adaptive refinement process 70 may reduce or eliminate the system's reliance on a given rule (such as by modifying the rule's weight value) if that rule tends to produce poor ketone scores or low user satisfaction ratings.

As show in FIG. 5, the adaptive refinement process 70 may use a set of miner rules 72 to evaluate existing rules in the rules database 46. As one example, a miner rule may specify that “if a user does not lose weight within 15 days or receiving a program update, the program update is bad.” Using this miner rule, the adaptive refinement process may search for updates (recommendations) that produced bad results, and may associate those negative outcomes with rule or rules used to generate the update. A miner rule may similarly be provided for searching for positive outcomes.) If, for example, the tally of positive outcomes is fails to exceed the tally of negative outcomes for a given rule, the rules database 46 may be updated to eliminate the rule or reduce reliance upon the rule.

The adaptive refinement process may also generate new rules. In embodiments in which the system records input from human coaches, the coach-supplied input may be used to generate or modify rules; for example, if coaches frequently make a particular modification to a particular recommendation generated by the system (such as by increasing an exercise duration recommendation from 20 to 30 minutes), the adaptive refinement process 70 may incorporate that modification into the rule used to generate that recommendation.

The system illustrated in FIG. 5 is designed to be scalable to accommodate large numbers of program participants (e.g., tens of thousands) and large quantities of data while providing good real time performance. For example, the number of worker machines may be increased as needed as the number of participants is increased. Each worker machine may include a processor and memory, and may execute a classification process as described above.

The various components of the system 40 in FIG. 5 may be hosted on a server-based computing system that comprises one or more physical servers or other computing devices, which may or may not be dedicated or persistently allocated to health-based coaching. The scheduler 54, transactional queue 56, classifier/recommender 42, API 50, notification system 62 and adaptive refinement component 70 may each be implemented in executable program code stored one or more persistent storage devices and executed by the computing system. In some embodiments the computing system may be geographically distributed, such that some devices of the system 40 are remote from other devices of the system 40. The various databases and data repositories 44, 46, 72 may be implemented using flat files, relational databases, and/or other types of data storage structures.

The recommendations provided by the classifier/recommender 42 are generally in the form of suggested behavioral modifications (e.g., “reduce carbs by X,” or “increase workout time by Y”). These behavioral modifications are typically part of a new or modified health program selected for the user, but this need not be the case. For example, the system may recommend that the user take ketone measurements more frequently, or may recommend initiating glucose or heart rate testing. As discussed below, in some cases the recommendations may be in the form of a ranked list of programs (or other behavioral options) from which the user can make a selection.

In the embodiment of FIG. 5, the logic for classifying users and generating associated recommendations is implemented within the server-based system, remotely from the user devices. In some embodiment, this logic may alternatively be implemented partly or wholly within the mobile application 32. For example, the mobile application 32, as installed on a user device 34, may include a set of rules for classifying users and generating associated recommendations. These rules may be static, or may be updated over time by a server-based system. Thus, in some embodiments the tasks of classifying users and selecting coaching messages for such users may be performed by the mobile devices and mobile applications of the users without the involvement of a server.

The server-based computing system that hosts or implements the AI-Based coaching 40 system may also include components (not shown) for implementing other features, including features for analyzing and adjusting ketone measurements and for generating reminders and alerts. Examples of such features are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,486,169 and 9,341,632, and U.S. Provisional Appl. No. 62/338,312, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

In addition to providing coaching to program participants (users), the system 40 may, in some embodiments, may provide automated coaching/recommendations to human coaches of such participants. For example, the system 40 may recommend to a human coach a particular coaching protocol for coaching a particular participant or class of participants.

User/Program Classification

Various implementation options for classifying users and generating associated program updates/recommendations will now be described.

In one embodiment, the inputs to the decision on how to classify the user (and/or the program to which the user is assigned) include some or all of the following information associated with the user: (1) ketone scores, (2) body weight measurements, (3) body composition reports, if available, (4) user history reports, and (5) user reported data, (6) number of missed ketone measurements (i.e., user fails to measure ketone level, (7) number of window aberrant ketone readings (i.e., user takes ketone measurement but outside the prescribed time window), (8) number of ketone measurements flagged by the user as being associated with non-program-compliant behavior. The possible classifications preferably include the following: (1) effective (i.e., the currently assigned program is effective for the user); (2) unhappy (e.g., the program is effective for weight loss but the user is bored, constipated, or otherwise dissatisfied); (3) adjusting (the program was effective but the user has adjusted and is getting diminished returns); (4) non-compliant (the user is not following the program, or is “cheating”); (5) ineffective (e.g., the program is not helping with fat burn and a change is needed). Numerous other classifications are possible.

In one embodiment, canonical curves are generated based on clinical data of ketone scores. These canonical curves represent different classifications. These curves may be scoped over a fixed period of time, such as two weeks from the start of the program. The system may classify a user based partly or wholly on how well the user's data matches one of the canonical curves. A rule may require a certain number of days' worth of data to be obtained before a classification is given.

Additionally, rules may be provided to look for salient signals and to circumvent regression comparisons. For example, if a user has missed more than 25% of their readings, a rule may automatically flag the user as non-compliant. As another example, a rule could be implemented that classifies a user as “unhappy” if the user reports that they are constipated more than 3 times over a 7 week period.

Other examples of rules include the following: (1) if a user's ketone score stays below 4 over X days, classify the user (program) as “ineffective,” (2) if a user sometimes gets a ketone score over 4 but sometimes gets scores below 1, classify the user as “non-compliant,” (3) if a user has slowly seen a monotonically decreasing trend in ketone scores for over a week, classify the user as “adjusting,” (4) if rules (1)-(3) do not apply, classify the user/program as “effective,” (5) if a user is classified as “effective,” but repeatedly reports being constipated, being hungry, or having low energy, classify the user as “unhappy.” The thresholds applied by these rules may be selected, or adjusted over time, using a regression process.

Additional classifications may be defined within the system 40 over time to better accommodate a wide range of variations between users. For example, a clustering algorithm may be applied to the user data records to search for new classifications. In one embodiment, the clustering algorithm generates 2×K clusters, where K is the current number of classifications, and generates a report that enables an administrator to assess whether any of the clusters should be converted into a new classification.

Each time a user is reclassified, the system 40 may take one of the following (among other) courses of action: (1) assign a new program to the user, (2) select a set of changes to the current program (e.g., adding a diet restriction), (3) output to the user a list of program options from which to make a selection, (4) suggest another type of behavioral modification, such as glucose testing, or (5) determine that no change is needed. The system may select between these courses of action using rules, using collaborative filtering (as described below with reference to FIG. 6), or using some other method.

Fat Gain/Loss Classification

As described above, the system in some embodiments periodically classifies each user as being in a Fat Burn phase (also referred to as “fat metabolism state”), a Fat Neutral phase, or a Fat Storage phase. As with the other types of classifications described herein, this classification task may be performed by either the server-based system (namely its classifier 48) or by the mobile application 32, and may be performed using a set of rules. As mentioned above, this classification task may be executed once the user completes the three daily tasks of measuring their weight, measuring their ketone level, and answering a set of questions.

The Fat Burn phase is based on elevated ketone levels and decreasing weight. If ketone levels are above a first user-specific threshold and weight is decreasing, the user is classified as being in the Fat Burn phase. If ketone levels are above a second user-specific threshold (lower than the first user-specific threshold) and weight is stable, the user is classified as being in the Fat Neutral phase. If ketone levels are below the second user-specific threshold or weight is increasing, the user is classifies as being in the Fat Storage phase. The ketone levels and weight are preferably averaged over a selected time period, such as a 7-day period, a 3-day period, or a 3-day period without any aberrant readings.

The system may also compute a Confidence Level for the classification. If, for example, the user is not performing any (or either) of the test steps each day or is not responding to the questions, the Confidence Level drops. If the user is seeing results that are outside the typical pattern (e.g., a ketone level that is 2 standard deviations above or below), the Confidence Level may drop.

To illustrate how users may be classified in terms of fat gain/loss (and coached accordingly), the data of five users is shown and discussed below. In these examples, the user is periodically asked to complete a “symptom card” that asks the user whether they are experiencing symptoms of hunger, constipation, lack of focus, lack of energy, lack of sleep, cravings, headaches, and diet fatigue (or boredom).

The data of a first user is shown in Table 3. The weight is trending downward, and the ketone scores are high (in this situation, >=4). This system would classify this user as being in the Fat Burn phase. Based on this determination and the lack of symptoms, the system would not recommend a diet change or other program change.

TABLE 3 Day Weight Ketone Score Symptom Card 1 162.0 5 No issues 2 162.0 6 — 3 161.8 7 — 4 163.2 8 — 5 161.5 5 — 6 161.2 5 — 7 161.0 6 — 8 160.8 5 — 9 161.5 6 — 10 160.5 5 —

The data of a second user is shown in Table 4. Given the discrepancy between limited weight loss and high ketone scores, the system would preferably prompt this user to offer an explanation. For example, the system may ask the user to indicate whether there is unusually high salt intake (contributing to water retention), an increase in physical activity (contributing to possible muscle gain), constipation, bloating due to menstrual cycle initiation (if applicable), or other factors. This user is in a Fat Neutral Mode with, for example, an 80% confidence. If there is no change in another 5-6 days, the system may recommend a diet change.

TABLE 4 Day Weight Ketone Score Symptom Card 1 162.0 5 No issues 2 162.0 6 — 3 161.8 7 — 4 163.2 8 — 5 162.0 5 — 6 161.5 5 — 7 162.3 6 — 8 162.0 5 — 9 161.5 6 — 10 162.2 5 —

The user data in Table 5 is the same as Table 3, except that there is a user report of “boredom.” In this situation, the system may prompt the user to indicate changes the user would like to make. Based on this feedback, the system may select/recommend a diet change.

TABLE 5 Day Weight Ketone Score Symptom Card 1 162.0 5 — 2 162.0 6 — 3 161.8 7 — 4 163.2 8 — 5 161.5 5 Medium Boredom 6 161.2 5 — 7 161.0 6 — 8 160.8 5 — 9 161.5 6 — 10 160.5 5 —

The user data in Table 6 shows low ketone scores and also no weight loss. The symptom report also shows that the user has not adjusted to a well-formulated diet program. The system may, for example, classify this individual as being in a Fat Neutral phase with a 50% confidence level and a Fat Storage State with an 80% confidence level.

TABLE 6 Day Weight Ketone Score Symptom Card 1 162.0 2 High Hunger High Cravings 2 162.0 3 — 3 161.8 1 — 4 163.2 0 — 5 162.0 2 — 6 161.5 1 — 7 162.3 3 — 8 162.0 2 — 9 161.5 1 — 10 162.2 2 —

The user data in Table 7 shows low ketone scores but also shows weight loss. The system may prompt this user for signs of dehydration, increased coffee consumption, stopping an exercise program or other things that could cause a weight loss without commensurate high ketones. However, ketone levels vary from person to person. The symptom report showing that the user is “feeling great” reflects that the user may just have low ketone levels (including a “0”), but is losing weight. The system may classify this user as being in a Fat Burn phase with a 60% confidence, but may update this classification if weight loss does not continue.

TABLE 7 Day Weight Ketone Score Symptom Card 1 162.0 2 Feels Great! 2 162.0 3 — 3 161.8 1 — 4 163.2 0 — 5 161.5 2 — 6 161.2 1 — 7 161.0 3 — 8 160.8 2 — 9 161.5 1 — 10 160.5 2 —

Presentation of Program Recommendations

To recommend a program (such as an exercise/diet program) to a user, the system may either pick a single program or give the user a choice between programs. (Each program typically includes a diet, and may also prescribe specific exercise activities.) If the user is given an option to select between program options, the program options are preferably presented in a ranked order to increase the likelihood that the user will select a top-ranked program, and the user's selection is recorded by the system. The program rankings may, for example, be based on rules that score the programs based on the user's data record. The following are examples of types of such program scoring rules: (1) if current diet is ineffective, score programs with more extreme diets higher, (2) if user is non-compliant, score “easier” diets higher, (3) if the user has unsuccessfully used the program previously, score the program lower.

The program rankings may also or alternatively be based on a predictive scoring scheme that scores candidate programs in terms of their predicted effectiveness for the particular user based on the data of other users. As one example, a collaborative filtering engine may score each candidate program in terms of how effective that program has been (based on the data collected by the system) for users having profiles similar to that of the target user. Any programs that the target user has already used unsuccessfully may be filtered from the ranked list (or lowered in rank) before the list is presented to the user.

Various options are available for controlling the timing with which program recommendations are provided to a user. For example, the system 40 may be designed to generate a new program recommendation for a user (1) when the user explicitly requests a new program, (2) periodically, (3) whenever the user's classification changes to “ineffective” or “non-compliant,” or (4) a combination of the foregoing.

Use Case Examples

The following use case examples illustrate user-system interactions for hypothetical users, and illustrate how users may be classified in terms of program effectiveness.

Bob—A Typical User

Bob starts using the system 40 to lose weight. He has gained weight consistently since high school and has over a hundred pounds to lose. The system (via the mobile application) initially assigns a standard low carb diet to Bob without giving him any other choices. He starts monitoring his ketone level with breath analysis device 30 and mobile application 32, and quickly generates sustained ketone scores of over 4. The system classifies Bob's program as “effective” and does not recommend any further changes.

Three weeks later and after losing 20 pounds, Bob's weight loss starts to slow. Additionally, Bob has indicated through the mobile application's UI that he is “unhappy” with the program and “wants to have quicker results.” In response to Bob's indications, a rule in the rules database 46 causes his program classification to be changed from “effective” to “unhappy.” Because this rule triggers a change in program classification, another rule (which is scheduled to run on any program classification change) runs and recommends a more “extreme” diet. Following this rule, the only “extreme” diet after the standard low carb diet is a fat fast. Through the mobile application, the system then provides Bob with the following ranked list of diet options: (1) fat fast; (2) continue on regular diet; (3) switch out common foods so there is more diversity.

Bob declines to use the fat fast because of other concerns and informs the mobile application that he will continue with the same diet. The system then follows a rule that classifies Bob as “off the beaten track” and notifies his human coach. The coach looks at Bob's results and realizes that Bob's expectations are unrealistic. The coach uses the system 40 to prepare an anonymized report of aggregated diet trends showing that Bob's progress is normal, and provides this report to Bob. (The system 40 could alternatively generate and provide such a report without coach intervention.) The coach indicates to the system (e.g., through a coach version of the mobile application) that a manual intervention was taken.

Over the next couple of weeks, Bob starts making more progress. Also, his indications of being unhappy slow and eventually drop off. Instead, during his weekly questionnaires presented by the mobile application, Bob starts indicating that he is happy again. A classification rule in the system responds by causing Bob's classification back from “unhappy” to “effective.”

Two weeks later, the system 40 sends an email to the coach reminding the coach of the intervention, and informing the coach of successful results. This email is triggered by a rule that searches for a coach intervention followed by a positive change in state that is sustained for two weeks. In response, the coach adds a rule that causes users who are unhappy but are unwilling to adopt an extreme diet to, if applicable, be presented an anonymized report showing that their progress is normal compared to other users.

Sally—A Non-Compliant User

Sally starts using the system 40 and obtains ketone scores of 8-10 after her first week. She continues to get good scores but then starts cheating on her diet after two weeks. When she cheats, her ketone scores drop below 4. The system, via a pattern detection rule, detects a pattern in which ketone scores are above 4 but then sharply decline below 4. Following this rule, the system 40 instantiates an automated calibration procedure on the breath analysis device, and this procedure shows that the device is working correctly. The system, following its rules, then changes Sally's classifications from “effective” to “non-compliant”.

In response to the classification change, the system follows a rule to pick a behavioral modification. A trained SVM model indicates that sending reminders before lunch and before sleep will be useful. Sally's profile indicates that she usually goes to sleep at about 10 pm. The system then reminds Sally (e.g., via the mobile application 32 or a text message) at 9 PM each evening not to eat anything unnecessary.

This works briefly but then Sally continues cheating, and her classification is not changed. Ultimately, the system learns that the notifications were not effective, and discontinues their use for Sally. The next time the SVM model is trained, assuming Sally's data is part of the training set, the system may rely on Sally's data to update its rules to reduce or eliminate it reliance on the rule that caused the reminders to be presented.

After detecting that the reminders were ineffective for Sally, the system 40 follows a rule that causes a collaborative filtering component to be used to select a diet for the non-compliant participant. (The following section describes one embodiment of a collaborative filtering algorithm that can be used for this purpose.) To select the diet, the system matches Sally to users with similar profiles but who have obtained successful results, and based on the programs successfully followed by these users, generates five diet suggestions for Sally. Sally selects one of the five diet options and records her selection via the mobile application. The system also provides an option (with consent of the other users) for Sally to communicate through the mobile application with the similar users who successfully followed the selected diet option.

Sally is happy with the new diet suggestion, and the feedback she provides to the system over a period of two weeks causes the system to update her classification to “effective.”

Collaborative Filtering Algorithm (FIG. 6)

FIG. 6 illustrates a collaborative filtering algorithm and process that can be used to generate program recommendations for users of the system. This algorithm may, for example, be implemented by the classifier/recommender of 42 of FIG. 5, or by a separate recommendation engine (not shown) of the system 40.

In block 80 of FIG. 6, the process scores pairs of users in terms of their similarity to one another. This step may be performed periodically (e.g., once per day or once week) as an off-line task. User similarity is preferably measured by comparing the data records 44 of the users while giving different amounts of weight to different attributes or features. For example, age, gender, weight, weight loss goals, psychological profile (if known) and ketone score history may be given relatively high amounts of weight for purposes of calculating user similarity. Other attributes or features, such as those related to the number of missed or window-aberrant ketone measurements, may be given relatively little or no weight. The result of block 80 may be a data structure that maps each user to the N most similar users (where N is a selected value such as 20, 50 or 100). The associated similarity scores may be stored in this data structure.

In addition to being used to provide program recommendations, the user similarity determinations of block 80 may be used for social networking purposes. For example, the system 40 could use the user similarity mappings to suggest or create social network connections between similar users. These social network connections can then be used to enable the connected users to, e.g., communicate with each other via the mobile application 32.

The remaining steps, shown in blocks 82-90 of FIG. 6, may be triggered by an event and associated rule that causes collaborative program recommendations to be generated for a particular user, referred to herein as the “target user” (see “Sally” example above). In block 82, the process looks up the users determined to be the most similar to the target user. In block 84, the process filters out from this “similar users” list any users who did not attain and maintain an “effective” or similar classification for a threshold period of time, such as 2 weeks or 4 weeks. In block 86, the process generates a list of the programs (e.g., weight loss programs or other health programs) that produced the sustained effective classifications for these similar users.

In block 88, the process ranks the list of programs by scoring the programs in terms of predicted effectiveness for the target user. In one embodiment, each program is scored in terms of its frequency of effective use (e.g., how many similar users used it effectively). However, other factors may additionally or alternatively be considered. For example, effective use by a user who is highly similar to the target user may be given more weight than effective use by a less similar user. Further, the duration of effective use by the similar users may be considered.

In block 90, the ranked list is filtered and then output for presentation to the target user. The filtering may involve removal of any programs that have already been used unsuccessfully by the target user or that conflict with dietary or exercise restrictions of the target user. As an alternative to completely filtering out such programs, they may be lowered in rank.

Behavioral Modifications for Non-Compliant Users

In some embodiments, the system 40 may take one or more types of actions to attempt to correct the behaviors of users identified as “non-compliant.” The following are examples of such actions: (1) send time-based notifications to user reminding user not to eat during critical parts of the day, (2) send location-based notifications reminding user (e.g., reminding user not to eat certain things when the system detects that the user is at a restaurant), (3) prompt the user to log their diet, (4) asking the user's coach, or a member of the user's social network, to perform an intervention or otherwise provide support. These and other actions may be specified by a set of rules that are triggered by a transition to the “non-compliant” classification.

Coding of Rules

As described above, rules may be used both to classify the users and to generate the messaging (such as program recommendations) for the users and their human coaches. The rules can be hard coded into the business logic of the classifier 42 and/or the mobile application 32. However, this limits the flexibility of the system and the ease in which new rules are added. Thus, the rules are preferably stored instead in a relational databased 46, preferably as respective rows. Each such rule can preferably be dynamically enabled or disabled by updating the database 46.

In some embodiments, each rule is stored as source code in an existing programming language. To run the rule, the classifier (or some other component) fetches it from the database 46 and executes the code dynamically. Certain programming languages like Javascript, Ruby, and Python make it easy to dynamically execute code. However, using actual source code is not always desirable because it requires the users that input the rules (who usually are domain experts and not programming experts) to write software code. An alternative is to use a domain specific programming language (DSL). These tend to be languages that are less expressive and “powerful,” designed for domain experts rather than software engineers.

In other embodiments, some or all of the rules are implemented as conditional statements that are specified without the use of a programming language. To implement a conditional statement in one embodiment, the database includes (1) an “expression” column used to look up a certain value; (2) an “operation” column that denotes equals, greater than, less than, etc.; and (3) a “match” value. When the expression matches the match value, the rule is triggered and executed. This basic model can be enhanced by allowing Boolean combinations of conditional expressions with “AND”, “OR”, and “NOT” logic.

Typically, the rules are deterministic, but they do not need to be. Rules can be randomized or leverage other learning techniques. For example, a rule may be “try to predict the user's insulin tolerance and then do X otherwise do Y.”

Example User Interface Screens

FIGS. 7-10 illustrate example screen displays of one embodiment of the mobile application 32.

FIGS. 7 and 8 show views of a “dashboard” section of the mobile application 32. Both views include an indication of the current weight loss phase or classification of the user (fat storage, neutral, or fat burn). The view in FIG. 7 also includes a personalized set of questions for the user. The user's answers to these questions may be used by the system 40 to reclassify the user and to make associated behavioral (e.g., health program) recommendations. The view in FIG. 7 also includes a “things just for you” section with auto-selected messaging regarding the user's progress. The view in FIG. 8 also includes an indication of the weight loss program or “plan” currently assigned to the user, and includes an option to perform a new ketone reading.

FIG. 9 illustrates a “journey” section of the mobile application. The illustrated view includes auto-generated messaging regarding the rate at which the user is losing weight in comparison to other users of the system. The view also indicates that the system 40 has detected that the user is sensitive to diet products. The view also includes a timeline showing phases and events of the user since inception. The timeline shows that the user was initially in a “calibrating” phase in which the system determined the rate at which the user's ketone levels changed once the user started a low-carb diet, as discussed above with reference to FIGS. 2A-2D. The timeline also indicates weight loss events.

FIG. 10 illustrates a “report card” view that enables users to track their progress. The scorecard may be updated when, for example, the user completes the three daily tasks mentioned above, namely measuring their weight, measuring their ketone score, and answering a set of questions. The report card shows the user's current fat gain/loss phase (shown as “fat burn” in this example), program phase, ketone score, and weight. The “concerns” section includes auto-selected messaging related to the user's progress and to any auto-selected program modifications. The “explanations and definitions” section displays educational content that is auto-selected based on the user's current state.

CONCLUSION

Conditional language used herein, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” “may,” “e.g.,” and the like, unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without other input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment. The terms “comprising,” “including,” “having,” and the like are synonymous and are used inclusively, in an open-ended fashion, and do not exclude additional elements, features, acts, operations, and so forth. Also, the term “or” is used in its inclusive sense (and not in its exclusive sense) so that when used, for example, to connect a list of elements, the term “or” means one, some, or all of the elements in the list.

While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out novel features as applied to various embodiments, it can be understood that various omissions, substitutions, and changes in the form and details of the devices or algorithms illustrated can be made without departing from the spirit of the disclosure. As can be recognized, certain embodiments described herein can be embodied within a form that does not provide all of the features and benefits set forth herein, as some features can be used or practiced separately from others. 

1. A system capable of using artificial intelligence to provide health coaching based on breath ketone levels of users, the system comprising; a plurality of breath analysis devices, each breath analysis device comprising a ketone sensor capable of measuring ketone levels in breath samples of users to generate ketone measurements of the users, the ketone measurements reflective of effectiveness levels of current health programs assigned to the users, each breath analysis device comprising a wireless transceiver capable of wirelessly transmitting the ketone measurements of the users; and a computing system that hosts an automated health coaching system, the automated health coaching system configured to use a machine learning process to classify the users based, at least partly, on profiles of the users, including the ketone measurements of the users, the automated health coaching system further configured to use at least the classifications to select health program modifications, including diet modifications, for particular users, the computing system comprising one or more physical servers.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the automated health coaching system comprises a trained model, and is configured to use the trained model to classify the users.
 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the trained model comprises a feature extraction component that determines a plurality of features based on a data record of a user, and comprises a classifier that uses the determined features to classify the user.
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the automated health coaching system is configured to assign to a user a classification that represents an effectiveness of a current health program assigned to the user.
 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the automated health coaching system is configured to assign to a user a classification representing a rate at which the user's ketone measurements increase in response to placement of the user on a particular diet.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the automated health coaching system is configured to assign multiple concurrent classifications to a user.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the automated health coaching system comprises a data repository of rules, including a rule that specifies an action to be performed in response to a change in a classification of a user.
 8. The system of claim 7, further comprising an adaptive refinement component that adaptively modifies the data repository of rules based on feedback data reflective of effectiveness levels of the rules on health conditions of the users.
 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the automated health coaching system is programmed to use a collaborative filtering algorithm to select health programs to recommend to users, the collaborative filtering algorithm configured to select, for a target user, at least one health program that has produced effective results for users identified as being similar to the target user.
 10. The system of claim 1, further comprising a mobile application that runs on mobile devices of the users, the mobile application configured to enable a mobile device of a user to (1) communicate wirelessly with a breath analysis device of the user, and (2) communicate with the computing system, the mobile application further configured to display to the user health program modifications selected by the automated health coaching system for the user.
 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the mobile application is configured to prompt the user for information regarding an effectiveness of a current health program, and the automated health coaching system is programmed to use the information to classify the user.
 12. The system of claim 10, further comprising a wireless scale, the wireless scale comprising a wireless transceiver and being configured to report weight measurements to the mobile application.
 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the system is programmed to use at least weight measurements generated with the wireless scale, in combination with ketone measurements generated by a breath analysis device, to classify a user in terms of whether the user is burning fat.
 14. A process for providing automated health coaching to users, the process comprising: training a computer model using a plurality of pre-classified user data records, to thereby generate a trained computer model capable of classifying users based on profiles, including ketone measurements, of the users; providing a computer data repository of rules, including rules for selecting behavioral modifications for users based on classifications assigned to the users by the trained computer model; maintaining a user data record for a user in computer storage, the user data record comprising user profile data, including ketone measurements generated with a bodily fluid analysis device based on bodily fluid samples of the user; by the trained computer model, assigning at least one classification to the user based on the user data record, including the ketone measurements; and selecting, based on the data repository of rules and the at least one classification assigned to the user, at least one behavioral modification to recommend to the user, said selecting performed by a computing system under control of executable program code.
 15. The process of claim 14, wherein selecting at least one behavioral modification comprises selecting a health program for the user.
 16. The process of claim 14, wherein selecting at least one behavioral modification comprises selecting a plurality of health program options for the user, and wherein the process further comprises generating, and outputting to the user, a ranked listing of the plurality of health program options.
 17. The process of claim 14, wherein assigning at least one classification comprises assigning a classification that represents an effectiveness of a current health program assigned to the user.
 18. The process of claim 14, wherein assigning at least one classification comprises assigning a classification that represents a detected rate at which the user's ketone measurements increase in response to placement of the user on a particular diet.
 19. The process of claim 14, wherein assigning at least one classification comprises determining a plurality of features associated with the user by applying feature definitions to the user data record, and using the determined plurality of features to classify the user.
 20. The process of claim 14, wherein assigning at least one classification comprises assigning a plurality of concurrent classifications to the user.
 21. The process of claim 14, wherein selecting the at least one behavioral modification comprises selecting a modification to a health program currently assigned to the user.
 22. The process of claim 14, further comprising, by execution of program code, determining an effectiveness level of at least one of the rules based at least partly on ketone measurements resulting from application of the rule.
 23. The process of claim 14, wherein selecting at least one behavioral modification comprises selecting a diet or diet modification for the user.
 24. The process of claim 14, wherein selecting the at least one behavioral modification comprises executing, by the computing system, a collaborative filtering algorithm that selects at least one health program that has produced effective results for users identified as being similar to the user.
 25. A computer system comprising one or more computing devices programmed with executable program code to implement at least: a feature extractor that identifies features associated with a user based on a profile of the user, including ketone measurements of the user, the ketone measurements reflective of an effectiveness of a current health program assigned to the user; a classifier that assigns one or more classifications to the user based on the features identified by the feature extractor; and a recommender that generates classification-based recommendations of behavioral modifications for the user based at least partly on the one or more classifications assigned to the user by the classifier.
 26. The computer system of claim 25, wherein the one or more classifications include at least one classification representing an effectiveness of the current health program.
 27. The computer system of claim 25, wherein the classifier comprises a trained computer model trained with pre-classified user data records.
 28. The computer system of claim 25, wherein the recommender uses a set of rules to select health programs to recommend to users, including rules that are triggered by changes is user classifications.
 29. The computer system of claim 28, wherein the computer system is programmed to use feedback provided by a human coach of the user on the recommendations to modify the set of rules.
 30. The computer system of claim 25, wherein the recommender uses a collaborative filtering algorithm to generate the recommendations. 